Back to Blog

The Importance of Cleanliness Testing

Posted by Sean Horn

Friday, July 7, 2017 7:23

@ 7:23 AM

The Need for Cleanliness Testing                                          

Successful conformal coating relies on ensuring the surface of the printed circuit board (PCB) is thoroughly clean prior to coating application.  PCB contamination can cause critical degradation of coatings’ dielectric strength and insulation resistance.  Cleanliness testing monitors the PCB’s condition, assuring it is sufficiently free of contaminants to accept coating.

Cleaning before coating should be standard practice.  Ionic residues are a class of PCB contaminant consisting primarily of flux activators, plating chemistries, surfactants and worker-perspiration.  They contain atoms or molecules conductive in solution.  Disassociation of ionic residues into either negatively or positively charged particles increases:

  • their environment’s overall conductivity, and
  • susceptibility to corrosion or dendrite growth,
  • common PCB failure mechanisms.

Often by-products of manufacturing processes, ionic residue/contamination has a higher failure rate than its counterpart, nonionic contamination.  Ionic cleanliness testing is recommended to assure to detect ionic contaminants, so they can be eliminated before coating is initiated.

In contrast, nonionic residues are not conductive; usually organic, they consist of materials like grease, hand lotion, oil, resin and silicone.  Generally effective as dielectrics, nonionic contaminants don’t short-out PCBs.  However, their insulative properties can generate unwanted assembly impedance, as well as:

  • encapsulation of ionic contaminants,
  • physical interference with moving parts,
  • retention of foreign debris and. most importantly,
  • substandard coating/solder-mask adhesion.

Cleanliness testing detects nonionic residue, supporting their removal from the PCB.

Enacting Cleanliness Testing                                  

Visual inspection at magnification of 10-15X is the simplest method of detecting the presence of both ionic/nonionic residue, but provides no reliable quantitative data regarding contaminant type.

Separate tests are used to ascertain the presence of ionic and non-ionic contaminants.  A simple quick-and-dirty test can be used in some cases to determine aa PCB’s cleanliness.  Differences between ionic/non-ionic residue is apparent even in these situations:

  • Ionic contaminants dissolve in water.
  • In contrast, non-ionic contaminants only dissolve in alcohol.

The resistivity of solvent extract (ROSE) method is used to test for the presence of ionic residue on substrates.  ROSE first establishes a solution’s conductivity level in solution.  Samples are immersed in a solution of deionized water and isopropanol alcohol (IPA) at room temperature for 10 minutes or more, according to the guidelines of IPC-TM-650, method 2.3.25.  If the board is still contaminated with ionic compounds, resistivity decreases; in contrast, conductivity increases.  The objective is meeting an ionic cleanliness requirement of 1.56 microgram (µg) of sodium chloride (NaCl) equivalence (º) per square centimeter (cm2) of extracted surface, according to requirements of MIL-STD-2000 and IPC-J-STD-001.

Alternative cleansing tests include ionic chromatography (IC); while ultrasonic agitation improves testing efficiency, the method is not acceptable for all PCBs.  Surface insulation resolution (SIR) and electrochemical migration testing (EMT) can be effective for preliminary screening of materials/processes employed for PCB manufacture.  However, requiring specialized interdigitated comb test-patterns limits their value for determining contaminants’ impact on PCB-reliability.

Not detected by ROSE, measuring nonionic contamination is more complicated.  Most widely used is Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR), wherein bands of absorbed infrared radiation identify molecular components/structures of any residue, categorizing the contaminants.  Other testing methods for nonionic residue include:

  • Auger analysis/Energy Dispersive X-ray (EDX) analysis/Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), methods that identify a range of nonionic contaminants.
  • High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC)/UV-Vis Spectroscopy both identify rosin residuals.

These methods require costly, high-maintenance, time-consuming technologies that discourage common use.  Solvents and surfactants safely remove organic and other nonionic contaminants from PCBs.

Rationale for Ensuring PCB Cleanliness              

Pre-washing of PCBs prior to applying conformal films is a fundamental function of the coating process.  Circuits cleaned prior to conformal coating eliminate the presence of PCB-residues, improving ongoing performance.

Prior to coating, PCBs are subjected to a multiplicity of handling/production processes which leave residues in their wake.  Ionic or non-ionic in nature, they can affect every assembly component/surface, or just selected areas.  Effected areas can rapidly experience increased reactivity after the PCB is in use, especially in a humid or more aggressive operational environment.

Overall PCB cleanliness is influenced by these added process contaminants like flux, cleaning residues and particulates from the surrounding production area.  The condition of assembly components and laminates also effects substrate cleanliness.  Bacteria, fingerprints (bodily oils/salts)/hand contaminants (hand creams), food residues, fungus, halides, metallic salts, mold and its release agents are among the most prominent surface residues generating PCB coating-reliability issues.  Potential outcomes encompass:

  • corrosion of the conformal coating,
  • its delamination,
  • dendritic growth, and
  • electro-migration.

Breakdown of conformal protection generates aesthetic or functional defects.  In dry state, coating-defects include adhesion-loss, blisters, craters, cure inhibition, or fish eyes.  Major wet state defects are de-wetting, pinholes and poor overall coverage.  PCBs remaining contaminated beneath conformal coating are subject to reduced circuit efficiency and failure.  Residues can also negatively impact soldering performance and joint reliability.

Well-implemented cleaning processes and their subsequent quality-testing support optimal coating adhesion; poorly enacted PCB/substrate cleaning generates numerous defects that lead to coating failure.  Cleaning limits process defects; testing ensures its done correctly.

To learn more about conformal coating, download our whitepaper now:

{{cta(‘10514981-93db-4d75-a2d0-ffaa68a2d8a8’)}}

Comments

londondrugscanada.bigcartel.comlondon-drugs 4/17/2020. 10:17:10 AM

cialis uk https://londondrugscanada.bigcartel.com/london-drugs This is nicely expressed. !

Homepage 4/17/2020. 10:17:10 AM

... [Trackback] [...] Informations on that Topic: blog.paryleneconformalcoating.com/whats-the-difference-between-potting-and-conformal-coating/ [...]